At 11:44 am on September 19 , 1982 , abulletin boardin Pittsburgh changed the existence .

Carnegie Mellon computer science prof Scott Fahlmanonly meantto stop the constant bickering on the board . alternatively , he had fabricate the emoticon :

19 - Sep-82 11:44     Scott E   Fahlman              :-)

But of path , English is n’t the only linguistic process to employ emojis , and a new written report ,   published in the journalOnline Social Networks and Media , has bring out the differences and similarity in emoji employment across the world .

“ Despite their ubiquitousness in human societal medium communicating , there are many question about emoji exercise that had not been treat in detail , ” explains the study . “ [ W]e project a detailed empirical written report for answering some of these questions . ”

The survey was a immense undertaking . For one month , the investigator canvas “ the Twitterdecahose ” – that ’s ten pct of the entire public output of the social medium platform . To put thing into context of use , an average of6,000 tweetsare sent worldwide every 2d , and the intermediate tweet length isaround 85 character long , which means that the researchers had to pore through around41,000 bibles ’ worthof online ramblings .

So what did they find ? Well first of all , despite having literally thousands of emojis to opt from , it twist out most tweeters are an unadventurous bunch . accord tolead writer Mayank Kejriwal , most emojis you ’ll see in the natural state come from a selection of just 100 .

But more importantly , Kejriwal says , emojis give away something fundamental about the human condition . Worldwide , the research worker set up that worldwide emotions dominated , while divisive picture such as flags were less prevalent . Emoji popularity is strikingly standardised across spoken language – and they reveal tie-in between languages that you in all likelihood would n’t expect .

“ [ It is ] instructive to liken the most similar and dissimilar pairs of voice communication in terms of their emoji usance chance distribution , ” the study explains . “ [ T]he most similar pair of spoken language is Japanese and Finnish , watch over by French and Turkish . These are interesting determination because the languages are lingually different . ”

The word “ emoji ” comesfrom the Japanese“e ” , “ mo ” , and “ ji ” ( meaning “ picture ” , “ drop a line ” , and “ character ” respectively ) , so you might anticipate Japanese tweets to have a caboodle of them . In fact , the greatest use of emojis come from English , Spanish , and Arabic speakers . Arabic tweets , by the style , use emojis in a completely different elbow room from almost the entire rest of the humankind – for example , the favored icon in the middle east is the love heart , while worldwide it ’s the good previous ( or should that bebadold ? ) watchword - laugh emoji . Even within single countries , there were geographic difference , with coastal cities using more emojis than inland country .

But while this study has shed a slew of light on the crude data point of emoji usance , what the researchers want next is context .

“ [ A ] line of subject that may further reveal mystifying - invest lingual and cultural differences ( especially the latter ) is the feeling of the tweets in which popular emojis are used , ” concludes the newspaper publisher . “ For example , we may learn that one commonwealth ’s emoji tweets are overly personal , while those from another country are more political . These are , of trend , correlated with the cultural and political norms in the country , but thus far , there have not been many authentic ways of measuring and quantifying such average using ‘ grassroots ’ information such as societal media . ”

So let ’s learn it for emojis : an unexpected brainstorm into the oecumenical human experience . And you thought they were just a quick room to sext .

This Week in IFLScience